| Up to $10 Million | $10 Million - $100 Million | $100 Million - $1 Billion | $1+ Billion | Biotechnology | Full Results | Business/ Industrial Equipment | Aerospace/Aircraft/Automotive
Construction/Industrial/Office Automation | Chemicals | Full Results | Consumer/ Retail | Full Results | Full Results | Educational/ Non-Profit | Full Results
Undisclosed | Full Results | Full Results | Energy/Utilities | Full Results | Up to 1,000 Employees
1,000+ Employees | Up to 10,000 Employees
10,000+ Employees | Financial | Full Results | Up to 1,000 Employees
1,000+ Employees | Up to 10,000 Employees
10,000+ Employees | Food/ Beverages/ Restaurants | Full Results | Governmental/ Quasi-Governmental | Full Results | Healthcare | Full Results | Medical Equipment/ Supplies/Diagnostics
Medical Facilities/ Managed Care Programs | Full Results | Hospitality/ Gaming/ Lodging | Full Results | Insurance | Commercial/Industrial/Surety/Title
Casualty/Property/Life | Manufacturing | Full Results | Materials Processing | Full Results | Media/ Communications/ Broadcasting/ Publishing | Full Results | Pharmaceuticals | Full Results | Real Estate/ REIT/ Development | Full Results | Services | Full Results | Full Results | Technology | Hardware/Instruments
Integrated/Web-Based Solutions | Hardware/ Instruments
Services/Software 1,000-10,000 Employees | Up to 10,000 Employees
10,000+ Employees | Services/Software Up to 1,000 Employees/10,000+ Employees/Up to $100 Million/$1+ Billion | Transportation/ Logistics | Full Results |
|
Top Winners: Supplemental Categories |
HOW THE COMPETITION WAS JUDGED INTRODUCTION
The competition was judged by a field of communications professionals affiliated with LACP. Their expertise spans a broad spectrum of PR functions ranging from corporate, executive, and internal communications for Fortune 500 organizations to product, service, and non-profit publicity expertise. Judges are screened to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest.
COMPETITION CLASSES
Award results are based on the judging of submissions within peer-level competition classes. Competition classes are established to create the most level playing field possible between entries. They are determined according to company size, annual revenue, and other pertinent factors included on the entry form.
SCORING
Scoring is derived according to a proprietary judging system developed by LACP, which assigns point values to various criteria of an entry. The Competition Scorecard provides further details on these criteria as well as the scores earned. A composite score, based on a 100-point scale, is then determined by summing the results of all judging criteria. Narrative descriptions can be correlated to an entry’s scores according to the following chart: Point Scale | | 0-10
| 0-20
| 0-30
| 0-100 (Total Score) | Narrative Description | 10 | 19-20 | 28-30 | 91-100 | Outstanding – Among the Best Ever | 9 | 17-18 | 25-27 | 81-90 | Excellent – Among the Competition’s Best | 8 | 15-16 | 22-24 | 71-80 | Very Good – Extraordinary Performance | 7 | 13-14 | 19-21 | 61-70 | Good – Strong Performance | 6 | 11-12 | 16-18 | 51-60 | Slightly Above Average | 5 | 9-10 | 13-15 | 41-50 | Average | 0-4 | 0-8 | 0-12 | 0-40 | N/A |
The entry with the highest total score within its competition class is presented with the Platinum Award. The entries with the second-, third-, and fourth-highest total scores within their competition class garner the Gold, Silver, and Bronze Awards, respectively. In the event of a tie, multiple awards are distributed per award level. Honorable Mentions are earned by entries not scoring within the top four award levels of any given competition class but achieving a minimum score of 75.
TOP 100
Top 100 awards are given to the highest-scoring entries regardless of competition class. Ties are broken by weighting various judging criteria according to overall importance. | Top 100 Annual Reports of 2002 | 1. | Henkel | 2. | Jack in the Box/ viadesign | 3. | FEMSA/ Paragraphs Design | 4. | U.S. Department of State | 5. | Lockheed Martin | 6. | Cognis Deutschland/ Creativ Partner | 7. | Caterpillar | 8. | BASF Aktiengesellschaft | 9. | National Science Foundation/ Eagle Design & Management | 10. | Fresenius Medical Care AG | 11. | California Bay-Delta Authority | 12. | Infonet Service Corporation | 13. | Hibbett Sporting Goods/C.I.A.-C.C.I. | 14. | The Sharper Image | 15. | Yale-New Haven Hospital | 16. | International Multifoods | 17. | Rockwell Collins, Inc./ Edelman Design Communications | 18. | Engelhard Corporation | 19. | Bunge Limited/ Edelman Design Communications | 20. | Coca-Cola FEMSA/ Paragraphs Design | 21. | Salt River Project | 22. | PPIC | 23. | The First American Corporation/ Ervin Bell Advertising | 24. | Halliburton | 25. | MVV Energie AG | 26. | KPMG Foundation | 27. | Evergreen Bancorp/ Rocket Dog Communications | 28. | City of Tacoma Environmental Services | 29. | Biovail Corporation | 30. | Shell International | 31. | Weizmann Institute | 32. | Teekay Shipping | 33. | Manitowoc/Meta-4 Design, Inc. | 34. | Delphi/Mentus | 35. | AGL Resources, Inc./ Thinkhouse Creative | 36. | Neoforma, Inc. | 37. | Verity, Inc. | 38. | Diversa Corporation | 39. | CNH Global NV/ Edelman Design Communications | 40. | Stratos Global/ Banfield-Seguin | 41. | Peabody Energy | 42. | Symantec Corporation | 43. | Dell | 44. | Entegris | 45. | Tampa Water Department/ Cherry and Company | 46. | Power Financial Corporation/ Ardoise Design | 47. | Gibraltar Steel Corporation | 48. | Boeing/ Meta-4 Design, Inc. | 49. | Bear Stearns | 50. | Citigroup | 51. | FPL Group | 52. | Keane, Inc. | 53. | General Electric | 54. | Diabetes Research Institute and Foundation | 55. | Entergy | 56. | Office Depot/ JKG Group | 57. | Hormel Foods Corporation | 58. | Neurocrine Biosciences/Mentus | 59. | MasterCard International | 60. | Polycom/viadesign | 61. | Agrium, Inc. | 62. | International Speedway Corporation/ Patterson-Bach Communications | 63. | Foothill Independent Bank | 64. | PartnerRe, Ltd. | 65. | Orlando-Orange County Expressway/ Patterson-Bach Communications | 66. | O'Charley's/ Corporate Design | 67. | Cascades, Inc. | 68. | Buca, Inc. | 69. | Pitney Bowes, Inc. | 70. | Georgia-Pacific/ Thinkhouse Creative | 71. | Readsoft AB | 72. | WellPoint Health Networks | 73. | SICOR, Inc. | 74. | AIG/SGI Graphics | 75. | CO-OP Network/ Pacific Communications Group | 76. | Alcon, Inc. | 77. | ProQuest Company/ The Reynolds Communications Group | 78. | Acres Gaming, Inc. | 79. | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 80. | InterGen/Calypso Communications | 81. | Gannett Company | 82. | State Farm Insurance Companies | 83. | Sensient Technologies Corporation | 84. | Constellation Energy | 85. | Monster Worldwide | 86. | Concur Technologies | 87. | Big Lots, Inc. | 88. | Home Properties | 89. | Cousins Properties/ See See Eye | 90. | Tiffany & Co. | 91. | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | 92. | Scholastic, Inc. | 93. | Biosite/viadesign | 94. | Geac | 95. | Magna International | 96. | Colgate-Palmolive | 97. | Hilton Hotels | 98. | MRO Software/ Hull Creative Group | 99. | The Regence Group | 100. | Regency Centers |
|
|