Competition-Wide, Quality-Specific Winners |
|
Competition Class Winners |
|
HOW THE COMPETITION WAS JUDGED
INTRODUCTION
The competition was judged by a field of communications
professionals affiliated with LACP. Their expertise spans a
broad spectrum of PR functions ranging from corporate, executive,
and internal communications for Fortune 500 organizations to
product, service, and non-profit publicity expertise. Judges
are screened to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest.
COMPETITION CLASSES
Award results are based on the judging of submissions within
peer-level competition classes. Competition classes are
established to create the most level playing field possible between
entries. They are determined according to company size, annual
revenue, and other pertinent factors included on the entry form.
SCORING
Scoring is derived according to a proprietary judging system
developed by LACP, which assigns point values to various criteria of
an entry. The Competition Scorecard provides further
details on these criteria as well as the scores earned. A composite
score, based on a 100-point scale, is then determined by summing the
results of all judging criteria.
Narrative descriptions can be correlated to an entry’s scores
according to the following chart:
Point Scale |
|
0-10 |
0-20 |
0-30 |
0-100
(Total Score) |
Narrative Description |
10 |
19-20 |
28-30 |
91-100 |
Superb – Among the Very Best Judged |
9 |
17-18 |
25-27 |
81-90 |
Excellent – Outstanding, Strong Performance |
8 |
15-16 |
22-24 |
71-80 |
Very Good – Positive Feedback from Judging Staff |
7 |
13-14 |
19-21 |
61-70 |
Good – Acceptable with Room to Improve |
6 |
11-12 |
16-18 |
51-60 |
Fair – Good Qualities But Problems as Well |
5 |
9-10 |
13-15 |
41-50 |
Mediocre – Weaknesses Dampen Efforts |
0-4 |
0-8 |
0-12 |
0-40 |
Poor – Re-Evaluation Strongly Recommended |
The entry with the highest total score within its competition
class is presented with the Platinum Award. The entries with
the second-, third-, and fourth-highest total scores within their
competition class garner the Gold, Silver, and Bronze Awards,
respectively. In the event of a tie, multiple awards are
distributed per award level.
Honorable Mentions are earned by entries not
scoring within the top four award levels of any given competition
class but achieving a minimum score of 85.
Top 50
Top 50 awards are given to the highest-scoring entries regardless
of competition class. Ties are broken by weighting various judging
criteria according to overall importance.
LEGAL NOTICE
Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 are registered trademarks of Fortune
Magazine. NOTES
* These two categories are linked as one. |
Top 50
Comms.
Materials of 2006 |
1. |
ESPN, Inc. |
|
2. |
American Airlines / Weber Shandwick |
|
3. |
Omni Hotels / Weber Shandwick |
|
4. |
American Airlines / Weber Shandwick |
|
5. |
American Airlines / Weber Shandwick |
|
6. |
Wal-Mart Stores
Weber Shandwick |
|
7. |
CBS Corporation / Buck Consultants |
|
8. |
Boost Mobile / Miles Ahead Entertainment |
|
9. |
American Airlines / Weber Shandwick |
|
10. |
Walgreen's / Flowers Communications
|
|
11. |
Boost Mobile |
|
12. |
Inst. for Healthcare Improvement/ Goodman Media |
|
13. |
American Airlines / Weber Shandwick |
|
14. |
iNet Office / Graham & Associates |
|
15. |
Sony Electronics / The Hoffman Agency |
|
16. |
The PGA of America / Alday Communications |
|
17. |
Booz Allen Hamilton / U.S. Army (RDECOM) |
|
18. |
Boost Mobile |
|
19. |
Sony Electronics / Ruder Finn |
|
20. |
USAID |
|
21. |
American Airlines / Weber Shandwick |
|
22. |
EMC |
|
23. |
Boost Mobile |
|
24. |
Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber |
|
25. |
LifeScan, Inc. / Robert Marston Marketing
Comms |
|
26. |
KnowledgeStorm, |
|
27. |
METRO Cash & Carry / Pleon Duesseldorf |
|
28. |
ThinkFree / The Hoffman Agency |
|
29. |
OPPO Digital / FutureWorks, Inc. |
|
30. |
Booz Allen Hamilton/ U.S. Department of
Agriculture |
|
31. |
ADP / Cohn & Wolfe |
|
32. |
Allergan, Inc. / Chandler Chicco Agency |
|
33. |
Allergan, Inc. / Chandler Chicco Agency |
|
34. |
Allergan, Inc. / Chandler Chicco Agency |
|
35. |
AstraZeneca / Edelman |
|
36. |
America's WETLAND / Marmillion + Co. |
|
37. |
Honda / Flowers Comms. Group |
|
38. |
Lawry's / Flowers Comms. Group |
|
39. |
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago /
Edelman |
|
40. |
Adobe Systems Incorporated / A&R Edelman |
|
41. |
Colorado State University |
|
42. |
Int'l Hyperhidrosis Society / Chandler Chicco
Agency |
|
43. |
Cognis / XEO GmbH |
|
44. |
U.S. Postal Service |
|
45. |
CDW Government, Inc. / O'Keeffe & Company |
|
46. |
CDW Government, Inc. / O'Keeffe & Company |
|
47. |
Infrant Technologies / The Hoffman Agency |
|
48. |
Malibu / Ruder Finn |
|
49. |
AIDS Action Committee of Mass. /
Conventures, Inc. |
|
50. |
Eastman Kodak Co. / Eric Mower and
Associates |
|
|
|