home | help | email  







Return to the competition
home page.



View thumbnails of award-winning entries participating in LACP's Winners' Gallery



Visit the complete list of the Top 50 Comms. Campaigns of 2005.



Review the top-performing agencies from this year's competition.

 

 2005 Magellan Awards Competition Winners
New: View a Map of 2005 Magellan Awards Entrants

The 2005 Magellan Awards Communications Campaign Competition drew an unprecedented number of submissions representing a broad range of industries and organizational sizes. More than 475 entries were received, so competition was exceptionally tough.

Communications campaigns were judged in peer-level competitions, which are described in the classes below.  To view the winners for each competition, simply click on the class name.  A winners' gallery profile is available for winning annual reports whose entry form indicated participation.

Flag Key Fortune 500® Fortune 1000®
Belgium Bermuda Canada Czech
Republic
France Germany India Indonesia Israel Japan Korea Mexico New
Zealand
Norway Poland Romania Spain Switzerland Turkey UK USA

FULL RESULTS

Competition-Wide, Quality-Specific Winners


 

Platinum

 

National Restaurant Association 
Hill and Knowlton

"Dine for America"
 


 

Platinum

 

National Prostate Cancer Coalition 


National Prostate Cancer Awareness Campaign


 

Platinum

 

Palm, Inc. 
A&R Partners, Inc.

"Palm PR Casts into the Mainstream to Hook the Big Ones"

 


 

Platinum

 

Sony Ericsson North America 
Iris

Image America


 

Platinum

 

We Move 
Chandler Chicco Agency

"Life in Motion" Campaign


 

Platinum

 

Washington State Department of Transportation 


Hood Canal Bridge August 2005 Closure Outreach


 

Platinum

 

Boost Mobile, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nextel Corporation 
Hill and Knowlton

Boost Mobile Pro of Surf


 

Platinum

 

Myogen, Inc. 


"The Year of Clinical Results"

 

Competition Class Winners

  Up to
$10 Million
$10 Million -
$100 Million
$100 Million -
$1 Billion
$1+ Billion
Community Relations Corporate/For-Profit/Government
Non-Profit/Charity/
Foundation
Non-Profit/Charity/Foundation
Crisis Communications Full Results
Employee Communications Full Results Full Results
Organizational Communications Corporate/For-Profit Corporate/For-Profit
Government/Educational Institution
Non-Profit/Charity/Foundation
Product/Service Communications Business-to-Business Business-to-Business
Consumer Consumer Consumer
Hybrid/Other
  Up to
$10 Million
$10 Million -
$100 Million
$100 Million -
$1 Billion
$1+ Billion

HOW THE COMPETITION WAS JUDGED

Introduction Competition Classes Scoring Top 50

INTRODUCTION

The competition was judged by a field of communications professionals affiliated with LACP.  Their expertise spans a broad spectrum of PR functions ranging from corporate, executive, and internal communications for Fortune 500 organizations to product, service, and non-profit publicity expertise.  Judges are screened to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest.

COMPETITION CLASSES

Award results are based on the judging of submissions within peer-level competition classes.  Competition classes are established to create the most level playing field possible between entries.  They are determined according to company size, annual revenue, and other pertinent factors included on the entry form.

SCORING

Scoring is derived according to a proprietary judging system developed by LACP, which assigns point values to various criteria of an entry. The Competition Scorecard provides further details on these criteria as well as the scores earned. A composite score, based on a 100-point scale, is then determined by summing the results of all judging criteria.

Narrative descriptions can be correlated to an entry’s scores according to the following chart:

Point Scale

 


0-10


0-20


0-30

0-100
(Total Score)


Narrative Description

10

19-20

28-30

91-100

Superb – Among the Very Best Judged

9

17-18

25-27

81-90

Excellent – Outstanding, Strong Performance

8

15-16

22-24

71-80

Very Good – Positive Feedback from Judging Staff

7

13-14

19-21

61-70

Good – Acceptable with Room to Improve

6

11-12

16-18

51-60

Fair – Good Qualities But Problems as Well

5

9-10

13-15

41-50

Mediocre – Weaknesses Dampen Efforts

0-4

0-8

0-12

0-40

Poor – Re-Evaluation Strongly Recommended

The entry with the highest total score within its competition class is presented with the Platinum Award.  The entries with the second-, third-, and fourth-highest total scores within their competition class garner the Gold, Silver, and Bronze Awards, respectively.  In the event of a tie, multiple awards are distributed per award level.

Honorable Mentions are earned by entries not scoring within the top four award levels of any given competition class but achieving a minimum score of 85.

Top 50

Top 50 awards are given to the highest-scoring entries regardless of competition class. Ties are broken by weighting various judging criteria according to overall importance.

LEGAL NOTICE
Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 are registered trademarks of Fortune Magazine.

NOTES
* These two categories are linked as one.

Top 50 Comms.
Materials of 2005

1. The PGA of America / Alday Comms
2. Marmillion + Company
3. Palm, Inc. /
A&R Partners, Inc.
4. National Restaurant Association /
Hill and Knowlton
5. Washington State Department of Transportation
6. Colorado State University
7. Boost Mobile /
Hill and Knowlton
8. ESPN, Inc.
9. National Prostate Cancer Coalition
10. Sony Ericsson North America / Iris
11. American Airlines /
Weber Shandwick
12. American Airlines /
Weber Shandwick
13. Canadian Pacific Railway / Wells Fargo Institutional Trust Svc
14. TRICARE
15. We Move /
Chandler Chicco Agency
16. Allergan, Inc. /
Chandler Chicco Agency
17. Colorado State University
18. Rosum Corporation /
Panache Comms LLC
19. M&R Strategic Services
20. The Humane Society of the United States
21. American Airlines /
Weber Shandwick
22. Estes Park Aerial Tramway / Shannon Marketing Comms
23. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings /
Buck Consultants
24. Averitt Express /
Wells Fargo Institutional Trust Svc
25. American Airlines /
Weber Shandwick
26. Allergan, Inc. /
Chandler Chicco Agency
27. Kalido / Horn Group & Brands2Life
28. Firefly Mobile /
Grow Marketing
29. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Admin /
Goldman & Assoc.
30. Center for Child Protection/PetersGroup
31. Evergreen Lodge /
Graham & Associates
32. American Airlines /
Weber Shandwick
33. Greyhound Lines / Weber Shandwick
34. Myogen, Inc.
35. Allergan, Inc. /
Chandler Chicco
36. Colorado State University
37. Verizon Wireless /
Jeff Dezen PR
38. Yahoo! Autos /
Fleishman-Hillard
39. Mass. Komen Affiliate / Conventures
40. NetApplications /
FutureWorks
41. Union of Brewing Industry Employers of Poland / M&C Cons.
42. SI International /
CCG
43. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
44. Sybase /
Citigate Cunningham
45. Synovate /
Ruder Finn
46. Adobe Systems, Inc. /
A&R Partners, Inc.
47. American Airlines /
Weber Shandwick
48. USTA/Mid-Atlantic Section / The Hannon Group
49. Big Lots, Inc.
50. The Korea Society

Copyright (c) 2001-2006 - League of American Communications Professionals LLC - All Rights Reserved
LACP and SPIN are trademarks of League of American Communications Professionals